|
|
| 
Click on the image above for up-to-the-minute weather conditions from our weather center The weather instrument at the top of the page updates every 15 seconds. The 'Weather Underground' conditions update every 60 minutes from our weather center. Kniess' Pieces  CLASSIC GLOBAL WARMING I don't remember the name of the movie but I do remember Jack Nicholson saying, "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH". (Special thanks to my good friend Gary W. for reminding me the name of the movie was "A FEW GOOD MEN") My question to you is, "Can you handle the truth?" I mean pure, simple, no spin, fact-not fiction, unvarnished, in your face, reality check, nonsensational truth. I'm sure I'll get hate email, but I'm a big boy, I can take it. I've wrestled with how to present this issue since the conception of this website. I've decided to go forward with fact. I know you've heard all about what the media and special interests want you to believe, now lets move forward with simple fact. Before I go any further, I beg you to go to the attached link and take an easy to understand test on global warming. I'll be here when you get back. I promise. Welcome back. Now let's get down to it. If the name John Coleman doesn't mean anything to you, let me enlighten you. John Coleman, whom I've never met and have no affiliation with, says global warming is the biggest hoax ever played on the world. Thank you, John. John Coleman was the founder of, are you ready for this, THE WEATHER CHANNEL. Coleman is an honest man with guts. I respect that. Al Gore, on the other hand, is a politician. Politicians must have issues. Issues keep a politicians name in the public light, sell books, speaking engagements, magazine articles, and do I dare say it, movies. It's those items listed above that help make a politician rich. It's not the job they have or had that makes them wealthy. Why would anybody spend millions of his or her own dollars for a job, like president of the U.S., that I believe, pays $400,000 per year? Simple, a politician makes his or her money on the back end of a job, not the front end. Al Gore would have you believe the entire scientific community is onboard with "Global Warming". Sorry Al, you're NOT EVEN CLOSE. Al Gore would have you believe there is no margin of error in historic temperature based on core samples of the earth. However, when you talk with a scientist about historic time and core samples, depending on the "expert", you get a margin of error of between 10,000 to 400,000 years. Let me put this more direct. Global Warming fanatics want you to believe there is a huge margin of error in time and zero margin of error in temperature. The reason they want you to believe this, again, is simple. It's been said the earth's temperature has warmed by .7 of a degree (C) in the past decade. If there is only 1 (C) degree margin of error in core sample temperature that means there could be global cooling by .3 (C) of a degree during the last decade or global warming is actually 1.7 (C) degrees instead of .7 (C) of a degree. Enough of Al Gore, let's move on. Remember that pesky hole in the Ozone layer over Antarctica. Remember how it was, "mostly America's fault". Did you ever ask yourself, "If it's America's fault and the cause is our pollution, why is the hole over Antarctica?" Don't be down on yourself because you failed to think that one through. You are not alone. Oh, in one year the "hole in the ozone layer" (Which, by the way, is impossible to have because ozone is a gas and you can't put a hole in gas. You can make it thin and eventually make it deteriorate, but sorry, no hole) improved by 30%. Hummmmm, a 30% improvement with little atmospheric change. Explain that one. I can't and won't even try. During the course of time the earth has warmed and cooled for reasons that are unclear, but we do know that before the industrial revolution the warming of the earth was not caused by man made pollution. One of the grand assumptions made by the "Global Warming Groups" is that today's earth is better than if the atmosphere changed worldwide. The Grand Canyon was once covered with ice. Was the world better then? How about when the earth was so warm that Greenland was lush with vegetation? Was the world better at that time? How do we know today's climate is right for the world? What wise old man gave us that information? The world community would have you believe this issue (notice I didn't call it a problem) is America's fault. WHY is that???? Why is it ALWAYS America's fault??? If you subscribe to the Global Warming theory, then why isn't it China's fault? China is the country with the largest population. Why not them? Here's a grand idea. Let's crash the world's economy to fix a problem we're really not sure exits. That's what scientists that are making hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars a year promoting the theory of global warming want. Yes, there is a chunk of the scientific community getting very rich on convincing you there is an excess of global warming. Oh, meanwhile, you will get poor if we enact unneeded standards to fix a questionable problem. Are you seeing the big picture yet? Try this. If you believe, I mean REALLY BELIEVE, global warming is a problem and pollution is the root cause, you need to extrapolate the theory to the next level. The next level is, "What causes pollution?" Simple answer. PEOPLE. OK, now we've got the problem to its core. No government, religion or country will strictly enforce, let alone agree to population standards. It's the perfect solution that goes against every aspect. After all, if people are the problem then population control is the solution. With that I rest my case. Let the hate mail begin! UPDATE: 11/24/09 . . The Global Warming, now being called Climate Change, hoax is beginning to unravel. Oh, it's now being called Climate Change for two reasons: It's more politically correct. (Isn't it funny how a derivative of the word politics keeps creeping up in this issue? Connection, hummmmmmmmm, what do you think?) Second reason: In the event this ever unravels (and it is) you can throw out the words Climate Change and try and cover the tracks by saying Climate Change covers warming or cooling. This is called the "Use More Smoke and Mirrors" trick. A recent report in a major New York newspaper revealed e-mails from the leaders of the Global Warming/Climate Change issue. Those e-mails showed the "Scientists" cooked the books to make it look worse. So if you are now asking yourself, "Why would anyone do this?" Simple - - It's all about generating a little fear and making millions of bucks for select insiders in the process. Any reporter wanting to get to the bottom of this tangled mess will find it complicated, but the method of getting them is not so complex. FOLLOW THE MONEY. I don't have time to do it, but I wish I did. I would also suggest to anyone wanting to investigate this web of deceit - be very careful. There are millions, if not billions, of dollars at play in this. You will also uncover some very high profile names along with some well-connected power brokers. This will be a dangerous, if not deadly, pursuit. UPDATE: 1/20/2010. .The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a statement of regret for poorly vetted information released in 2007 regarding the rapid melt of glaciers in the Himalayas. It appears the glaciers will now be around much longer than the 2025 date originally stated in the report. Hummmmmm - - I guarantee more shoes will drop on this.
UPDATE: 1/23/2010. .Todays news....U.N. Official sites more errors in Global Warming report. Remember you read all about this hoax here, first. UPDATE: 1/28/2010. .Another unsurprising revelation....Scientists in Climate Scandal Hid Data. | |
|